Journal article

Jones, Lucy (under review) Essentialism and normativity in lesbian and gay youths’ coming out stories. Sexualities.

This article demonstrates, via discourse analysis of a group of young gay and lesbian people’s coming out stories, the salience of essentialist ideologies on their identity construction. The study reveals underlying normative assumptions in the young people’s narratives, including those associated with binary gender and innate sexual desire, which they employ in order to construct a culturally authentic sexual identity. Through close sociolinguistic analysis of interactions, it is shown how identity construction is directly influenced by broader ideologies. The analysis provides evidence of the continued prevalence of heteronormativity and homonormativity as key influences in young queer people’s identity work.

Journal article

with Georgina Turner, Sara Mills, Isabelle van der Bom, Laura Coffey-Glover and Laura L. Paterson (under review) Opposition as victimhood in media debates about same-sex marriage. Discourse and Society.

A summary of this paper can be found via the Discourses of Marriage Research Group blog.

In this paper, we take a queer linguistics approach to the analysis of data from British newspaper articles which discuss the introduction of same-sex marriage. Drawing on methods from critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics, we focus on the construction of agency in relation to: marriage; the government extending marriage to same-sex couples; those resisting this. We show that opponents to same-sex marriage are represented as victims whose moral values, traditions, and civil liberties are being threatened by a ‘politically correct’ minority. Specifically, we argue that victimhood is invoked in a way that both enables and permits discourses of implicit homophobia.

This work emerges from the Discourses of Marriage Research Group.

Journal article

Jones, Lucy (under review) “I’m not proud, I’m just gay”: Lesbian and gay youths’ discursive negotiation of otherness. Journal of Sociolinguistics

This article outlines the shared identity construction of five gay and lesbian members of an LGBT youth group, situated in a conservative, working-class, Northern English town. It is shown that the young people’s identity work emerges in response to the homophobia and ‘othering’ they have experienced from those in their local community. Through ethnography and discourse analysis, and using theoretical frameworks from interactional sociolinguistics, the strategies that the young people employ to negotiate this othering are explored; they reject certain stereotypes of queer culture (such as Gay Pride or being ‘camp’), and reject the notion that their sexuality determines their social identity. It is argued that this reflects the stigma of their sexuality and their subsequent desire to ‘fit in’ and be ‘normal’. These findings contrast with previous sociolinguistic studies of sexual identities and those focused on older participants, providing evidence of the impact of homonormativity (Duggan 2002) on contemporary, Western gay identities.

Journal article

Jones, Lucy (forthcoming 2018) Discourses of transnormativity in vloggers’ identity construction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language

Draft manuscript available here.

This paper investigates the construction of two transgender vlogger personas, providing insight into the prevalence of normative discourses which may be drawn on when constructing transgender identities. Many transgender people around the world rely on the internet as a source of information and guidance; online video diaries (‘vlogs’), in which young people record and chart their experiences of transition, play a particularly important role. In this paper, discourse from two popular transgender vloggers is critically analysed. It is found that the vloggers index identities which are broadly in line with what Zimman (2012) terms the archetypal ‘true transsexual’, an ideological model of what it means to be ‘authentically’ transgender. This corresponds with heteronormative, essentialist expectations of binary gender. The vloggers are shown to authenticate their own experiences by stating what is ‘typical’ and positioning themselves as ‘experts’. Ultimately, it is argued that the version of transgender identity and experience that they put forwards reproduces prevalent discourses of normative gender and sexuality.

Journal article

With Sara Mills, Laura L. Paterson, Georgina Turner and Laura Coffey-Glover (forthcoming 2017) Identity and naming practices in marriage and civil partnerships. Gender and Language, 11:3.

Manuscript available here.

Using data from an online survey of 1,000 respondents, this article demonstrates the continued prevalence of traditional, heteronormative practices regarding marriage and naming practices. The survey data reveals that it continues to be viewed as more ‘normal’ for a woman to take her husband’s surname in a heterosexual union. Whilst other options (such as the woman retaining the surname given to her by her parents, for instance) are often considered or taken following heterosexual marriage, these continue to be seen as a deviation from the norm. We find that the role of tradition is critical to people’s decision over what to do with their surname, whether they follow the culturally expected route or consciously deviate from it, and that it is broadly perceived that same-sex couples have comparably more freedom than heterosexuals to do as they choose regarding their names. Through qualitative, critical analysis of the discursive responses of those completing our survey, we demonstrate that heteronormative assumptions about a woman’s role in a relationship with a man have continued salience and that, for many heterosexual women, this leads to a conscious and often difficult negotiation of her own identity as both an individual and a wife. We also suggest that there is a cultural perception in the UK that same-sex couples’ relationships are intrinsically more equal than opposite-sex couples’, and that they benefit from standing outside of heteronormative traditions. This work emerges from the Discourses of Marriage Research Group.

Journal article

Jones, Lucy (2016) “If a Muslim says ‘homo’, nothing gets done”: Racist discourse and in-group identity construction in an LGBT youth group.  Language in Society, 45(1), 113-133.

Manuscript available here.

This article presents ethnographic data emerging from research with a group of LGBT young people, detailing the construction of a shared identity. Using discourse analysis, it shows how the group members position people of South Asian descent as a homogenous out-group, one framed as ‘other’ to their own in-group identity of ‘non-Asian’ due to the assumption that Asian people are homophobic. It is argued that this very local form of identity construction is facilitated by broader discourses of Islamophobia, as well as homonormative ideologies positioning gay people as white. The article therefore provides evidence to support Bucholtz and Hall’s (2005) claim that identity positioning relates not only to the interactional moment and the norms of a given ethnographic context, but that it also encompasses macro-level discourses and ideologies. It also, however, reveals the pervasiveness of Islamophobic discourses in Britain today, and the marginalisation of LGBT people of colour.

Book chapter

Jones, Lucy (forthcoming 2017) Lesbian Discourse. In Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality. Oxford University Press

This chapter provides readers with a discussion of the ideological discourses which have been found to be drawn upon in lesbian interaction, and which are often reinforced through the stereotypical representation of lesbians in the media. In doing so, the chapter explains key aspects of lesbian culture and experience, pointing out the very specific forms of objectification, invisibility and misogyny that can characterise this. It provides a survey of linguistic studies into lesbian representation, followed by a survey of the more substantial body of linguistic research into lesbian interaction. It is argued that we must continue to develop research into lesbian discourse in order to address some of the heterosexist assumptions implicit in earlier language and gender work.